<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Randy W. Hill, Texas Entrepreneur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rwhill.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rwhill.com</link>
	<description>Randy W. Hill, Texas Entrepreneur, Philanthropist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:42:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Randy Hill blog: $3 Gas?</title>
		<link>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-3-gas</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-3-gas#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RWHill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMERICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONGRESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwhill.com/?p=2091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week USA Today ran a front page story about rising gas prices:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2010-03-08-gasoline-prices_N.htm

As the article notes:
&#8220;The national average price for a gallon of gasoline is up 9 cents in a month and will likely crack $3 in coming weeks, given a typical spring rally before the summer driving season, oil and gas analysts say.&#8221;
This still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week USA Today ran a front page story about rising gas prices:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2010-03-08-gasoline-prices_N.htm%3Cbr%3E" target="_blank">http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2010-03-08-gasoline-prices_N.htm<br />
</a><br />
As the article notes:</p>
<p>&#8220;The national average price for a gallon of gasoline is up 9 cents in a month and will likely crack $3 in coming weeks, given a typical spring rally before the summer driving season, oil and gas analysts say.&#8221;</p>
<p>This still makes no sense to me. With the economy in a recession, people are driving less and therefore demand is less. So why are prices going up? The reason is because the gas market operates differently than other markets. A foreign oil cartel controls prices.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it time we did something about that?</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-3-gas/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Hill blog: Venezuela</title>
		<link>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-venezuela</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-venezuela#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RWHill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMERICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONGRESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwhill.com/?p=2088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today we begin our series on why America needs new sources of energy. And to  support that argument, I give you one word: Venezuela.
US demand accounts  for 60% of Hugo Chavez&#8217;s oil imports. So if we reduced our demand for his oil,  we would reduce him. And he needs to be reduced.
So [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today we begin our series on why America needs new sources of energy. And to  support that argument, I give you one word: Venezuela.</p>
<p>US demand accounts  for 60% of Hugo Chavez&#8217;s oil imports. So if we reduced our demand for his oil,  we would reduce him. And he needs to be reduced.</p>
<p>So why not expand our  exploration of natural gas here in the US? And why not expand our research into  renewable energy sources like wind and biomass?</p>
<p>Now is the time.</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-venezuela/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Hill blog: Energy</title>
		<link>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-energy</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-energy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RWHill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMERICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONGRESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALTERNATIVE ENERGY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAS PRICES]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwhill.com/?p=2086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So gas prices are heading back up. That&#8217;s expected as we approach  the summer and the driving months. But it&#8217;s also a good time to re-examine why  gas prices are so out of whack and why we need to re-focus our efforts on  renewable energy.
That&#8217;s what we&#8217;ll be talking about this week [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So gas prices are heading back up. That&#8217;s expected as we approach  the summer and the driving months. But it&#8217;s also a good time to re-examine why  gas prices are so out of whack and why we need to re-focus our efforts on  renewable energy.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what we&#8217;ll be talking about this week on  the blog. Join us each day!</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-energy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Hill blog: Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-obama</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-obama#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RWHill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMERICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONGRESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas primary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwhill.com/?p=2084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today we conclude our series on the Texas primary. And we focus on the one person who should be paying the most attention: President Obama.
Since last fall, President Obama has seen Republicans win in Virginia, New Jersey, Massachusetts and now Texas. What&#8217;s interesting about Texas is that many thought the Tea Party movement would tear [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today we conclude our series on the Texas primary. And we focus on the one person who should be paying the most attention: President Obama.</p>
<p>Since last fall, President Obama has seen Republicans win in Virginia, New Jersey, Massachusetts and now Texas. What&#8217;s interesting about Texas is that many thought the Tea Party movement would tear apart the GOP. Instead, the Tea Party movement helped increase GOP turnout, but still the party elected mainstream candidates. That&#8217;s bad news for the Democrats.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s time for the White House to start paying attention to these election trends. Let&#8217;s start over on health care, and get busy on things we can agree on, like carbon credits and a real jobs program.</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-obama/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Hill blog: Senator Hutchison</title>
		<link>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-senator-hutchison</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-senator-hutchison#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RWHill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMERICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONGRESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resignation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Hutchison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwhill.com/?p=2082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is another bit of fallout from Tuesday&#8217;s elections: what happens to Kay Bailey Hutchison?
http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/03/03/2012980/hutchisons-supporters-peers-urging.html

Should she stay or should she go? That is the question facing Senator Hutchison. Before she ever announced she would run for governor, Hutchison said she would resign to focus full-time on the gubernatorial race. But then she hedged and said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another bit of fallout from Tuesday&#8217;s elections: what happens to Kay Bailey Hutchison?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/03/03/2012980/hutchisons-supporters-peers-urging.html%3Cbr%3E" target="_blank">http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/03/03/2012980/hutchisons-supporters-peers-urging.html<br />
</a><br />
Should she stay or should she go? That is the question facing Senator Hutchison. Before she ever announced she would run for governor, Hutchison said she would resign to focus full-time on the gubernatorial race. But then she hedged and said she would wait until after the primary to resign.</p>
<p>Well, now the primary is over. And I think Hutchison should keep her word and resign. Do the honorable thing and let someone else have a chance.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-senator-hutchison/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Hill blog: Results Are In</title>
		<link>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-results-are-in</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-results-are-in#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RWHill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMERICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONGRESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas primary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwhill.com/?p=2079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the election returns are in. And it seems my prediction was correct. While the Tea Party movement helped energize new voters, most incumbents survived just fine. And many of them co-opted some of the Tea Party themes. Rick Perry is a great example. Though he&#8217;s been in office for years, he successfully cast himself [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the election returns are in. And it seems my prediction was correct. While the Tea Party movement helped energize new voters, most incumbents survived just fine. And many of them co-opted some of the Tea Party themes. Rick Perry is a great example. Though he&#8217;s been in office for years, he successfully cast himself as a man fighting against entrenched Washington power. It worked.</p>
<p>The question now becomes: what happens next? Will the Tea Party movement fade? Will the Republican Party continue to be alert and try and address Tea Party issues?</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-results-are-in/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Hill blog: Election Prediction</title>
		<link>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-election-prediction</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-election-prediction#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RWHill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMERICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONGRESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Perot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwhill.com/?p=2077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So here is my prediction for today&#8217;s elections:
I think the Tea Party movement will win by losing. That is, the Tea Party will have moved the GOP to the right, increased the party&#8217;s commitment to fiscal discipline and put the fear into a few GOP elected officials. All of that is good. But I don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here is my prediction for today&#8217;s elections:</p>
<p>I think the Tea Party movement will win by losing. That is, the Tea Party will have moved the GOP to the right, increased the party&#8217;s commitment to fiscal discipline and put the fear into a few GOP elected officials. All of that is good. But I don&#8217;t expect many of the actual Tea Party candidates to win. Why? In American history, protest movements rarely become majoritarian movements. Instead, they make their point and one or both of the parties takes on their issues. Think of Perot in 1992 talking about the deficit. Republicans and Democrats in the 1990s got the message and balanced the budget for the first time in decades.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s my prediction about tonight.  What&#8217;s yours?</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-election-prediction/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Hill blog: Election Time</title>
		<link>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-election-time</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-election-time#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RWHill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMERICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONGRESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas primary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwhill.com/?p=2075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, America begins to learn what the impact of the Tea Party movement will be  on the Republican Party. The Texas GOP Primary is tomorrow. And we&#8217;ll be  discussing the primary, its results and its meaning all week  long on this blog.
So if you are in Texas, be sure to vote [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, America begins to learn what the impact of the Tea Party movement will be  on the Republican Party. The Texas GOP Primary is tomorrow. And we&#8217;ll be  discussing the primary, its results and its meaning all week  long on this blog.</p>
<p>So if you are in Texas, be sure to vote tomorrow. And then  be sure to check back in each day this week and as we analyze the results together.</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-election-time/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Hill blog: Not Campaigning</title>
		<link>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-not-campaigning</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-not-campaigning#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RWHill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMERICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONGRESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCCAIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwhill.com/?p=2073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;We&#8217;re not campaigning anymore.&#8221;  That&#8217;s what President Obama said to Senator  McCain when the senator complained about the health care process during  yesterday&#8217;s summit.
I was saddened that the president didn&#8217;t  take this more seriously. I wish he would have said: &#8220;You&#8217;re right, Senator  McCain. The American people deserved a better process [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re not campaigning anymore.&#8221;  That&#8217;s what President Obama said to Senator  McCain when the senator complained about the health care process during  yesterday&#8217;s summit.</p>
<p>I was saddened that the president didn&#8217;t  take this more seriously. I wish he would have said: &#8220;You&#8217;re right, Senator  McCain. The American people deserved a better process than what they got. And  that&#8217;s why I wanted to hold this summit to see if we couldn&#8217;t start  over.&#8221;</p>
<p>But anytime anyone is defensive, it&#8217;s a sign that he  doesn&#8217;t really get it.</p>
<p>No, the president&#8217;s health care plan  isn&#8217;t unpopular because he didn&#8217;t explain it well enough or because he didn&#8217;t  package it well enough. It&#8217;s unpopular because it&#8217;s not a good plan and because  it was produced by a bad process.</p>
<p>The country understands that.  Too bad the president doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-not-campaigning/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Hill blog: Invite the Doctors</title>
		<link>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-invite-the-doctors</link>
		<comments>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-invite-the-doctors#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RWHill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMERICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONGRESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECONOMY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwhill.com/?p=2071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a novel idea for the president&#8217;s health care summit: invite some doctors.
The summit that will be held tomorrow appears to be long on symbolism and short on solutions. Rather than open an honest negotiation, the administration has stacked the deck by releasing the details of the president&#8217;s plan in advance of the meeting. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a novel idea for the president&#8217;s health care summit: invite some doctors.</p>
<p>The summit that will be held tomorrow appears to be long on symbolism and short on solutions. Rather than open an honest negotiation, the administration has stacked the deck by releasing the details of the president&#8217;s plan in advance of the meeting. We talked about that yesterday and it remains a prime example that this summit is just for show.</p>
<p>But here is another example: the only doctors who will be in on the negotiations are doctors who are Members of Congress. So we&#8217;re going to have a meeting about health care and not include the experts on the issue?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s some more bad medicine from this administration on health care.</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rwhill.com/randy-hill-blog-invite-the-doctors/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
